Elizabeth Short Blacklist

While censorship is always difficult to defend in theory, its remarkable how quickly we can, and do, resort to it in practice. Nothing is easier to find than censorship out here on the Internet, say what you will, but if you incense the insensibilities the domain-holder; then its, "farewell, and adieu to thee, sweet Spanish ladies. Farewell and adieu to ye ladies of Spain." Its half the fun, I should think. What good is some specious intellectual property if you have to share it with people who gets their kicks stompin' on a dream.

I bow to precedent here, having first had my contributions marginalized, and inevitably, any, and all communications with the seedy Black Dahlia discussion boards were very neatly severed. Its fair to say they found something about my contributions offensive, and having nothing with which to counter my purely scientific evidence, they unilaterally broke the stream, and resorted to the worst sort of bilemma. 

And they still don't have a clue, having kept themselves absolutely airtight, safe, and secure from the truth about Elizabeth Short, even as they sit, spin, and wait in hope for the Black Dahlia gravy train to finally run in.

As a BDiH non-person, I can't view any attachments, or follow any links. Ed is the name, which shall not be spoken, but other than that you're cool, if unenlightened for your trouble. While Larry publicly posts his unconscious enemies list as 'spam' comments at the Daily Mirror. And who's number one on Larry's shit list? You guessed it.

I wonder how much it costs him to keep up that absurd counter up? A proud, and impressive spite fence, as one sees, if you will? Why, for lil' ol' me? And not just me, I'll reckon. O.J. too. I'm sincerely flattered, please, don't stop, ever. Still, I cannot in good faith sell you readers off to a cheap four-flusher, a fatuous flim-flammer, or big fat carpetbagger liar like him — Please, please, please, do stop. I don't want to die laughing.

Larry may be God's gift to the newspaper business, but taken strictly as a homicide detective, he isn't. In that, he's worse than a rank amateur; he's wabsolutely full of it. And Steve Hodel? Steve's case is entirely, and overtly biased, that it lacks any useful objective framework, and since the two don't even agree, or show any tendencies to converge; you can easily dismiss the conclusions of both on those grounds a priori.

Maybe John Gilmore is another matter, but he's not a brave man, anymore, not given his last forum foray from which he fast fled. And why were there no wood traces in the Dahlia's skin if they had laid her out and cut her on these boards? What boards? She was secured to the rigging, upright, like Richard Harris in that manacled horse picture. Digging the LAPD's massive head out of the alluvial sands could take a minor miracle. But stranger things must have happened here, in the Magic Kingdom of Hollywood, Lando?

Larry says, "It's lunacy."

Q. What do you make of the "black dahlia solution.org" claims?



A. I think the site's gross manipulation of photos--alterting Elizabeth Short's eyes and mouth, for example--is disturbing. The writing style is virtually unreadable, so it's hard to get through, but what I've read is dysfunctional and demented.


Using the same logic (that Elizabeth Short's body was a "pointer" to Degnan Boulevard in reference to the Suzanne Degnan murder), one could say that the killer was "Gene Rayburn" because the next street over is "Grayburn." It's lunacy. And I wish the author, whoever he is, would stop sending me things under the phony name of "Jack Pico" from his mail drop in San Diego because I never read them. And for the record, there was no Ed Burns.

Special note: This is sarcasm not to be taken literally. I give this warning because it is impossible to say something about this case so absurd that no one will believe it. Again, I'm not saying Gene Rayburn was the killer. This is sarcasm intended to show the lunacy of the Degnan Boulevard claims!


— Larry Harnisch, Heaven is here:

FAQ